Методика формування навичок та вмінь писемного мовлення із застосуванням психолінгвістичної моделі висловлювання

3 - Generalizing/ concretizing the process characteristics

Cхема 3

2

1 a b c d 3

1 - Introducting an order of events or giving a judgement about their result

2 - Developing the events in a special order

a-c - the events

3 - Concluding the events order with a judgement

Схема 4

a 2

1 c f 3

d e

1 - Introducting a problem

2 - Searching for ideas connected with the problem (a-c), those which are connected with primary ideas, and ordering them due to their cause-and-effect relationships

a - f - ideas which promote the problem solvation

3 - Working out the concluding judgement, based upon the ideas considered, which solves the problem

Схема 5

2

A

1 3

B

1 - Introducing theses to a problem solution

2 - Searching for arguments which prove (A) or disprove (B) the theses and analysing their relationships

3 - Proving/ disproving the theses with a judgement

Each of the Schemes is abstract. For example, in the Scheme 1 (SD) there can be much more or less characteristic features of the subject concerned. In the Scheme 2 (PD) the process concerned can include more or, vice versa, less main stages. The same is with the number of events shown in the Scheme 3 (N). The Scheme 4 (RD) is more complicated than the previous ones. In this Scheme some abstract ideas are shown which are connected with the problem directly, and there are some others connected with the primary ideas to make a final conclusion. The number of them depends on your topic and your ability to generate ideas. At last the Scheme 5 (RA) is the most stable according to its components because each reasoning-argumentation consists of such parts as: introducing some theses to a problem solution, finding arguments which prove/ disprove these theses and making a conclusion which should correspond to the theses.